The collapse of the IL-18 19 in Yakutia December 2016 years.
Blog
The collapse of the IL-18 19 in Yakutia December 2016 years

The collapse of the IL-18 19 in Yakutia December 2016 years.

 

 

8:36 20/12/2016 One of the considered versions of the plane crash is a piloting error;

11:32 19/12/2016 At the crash site samolёtaspetsialistam have found the black boxes, the information on which it is likely, and will explain the reasons for the crash proizoshedeshy;

8:54 19/12/2016 Named the major versions of the plane crash, including adverse weather conditions and technical failure of the control system;

8:39 19/12/2016 Official data service officially denied the existence of the victims;

8:15 19/12/2016 In place of the plane crash have arrived several groups of rescuers, working on the analysis of a crashed airplane and clouds finding survivors and victims.

 

 

December 19 2016 years, in the implementation of the planned flight from Ekaterinburg in 27 kilometers from Tiksi, crashed the plane Il-18, which was carrying, according to some data, 40 people, among them, 8 aircraft crew members and passengers 32.

 

Chronicle of events

 

At the moment it is known that the plane IL-18, on board which in addition to 8 crew members were 32 servicemen, flew from Ekaterinburg. Nevertheless, according to information available from the Avia.pro resource, a few moments before the crash, the pilot of the aircraft reported that the aircraft lost control, after which the connection with the crew was interrupted. Immediately arrived rescuers at the crash site, found on the crash site, literally collapsed into three parts of the aircraft, the pilots of which were still able to make an emergency landing in adverse conditions.

 

 

The causes and circumstances of the crash of IL-18 in Yakutia

 

At the moment, the official information about the possible causes of the crash that occurred were not disclosed, but, according to Avia.pro resource, blame could be adverse weather conditions, in particular, we are talking about snow and strong crosswinds. Independent experts do not rule out the likelihood that it was a gusty wind could disrupt management of turboprop aircraft, however, until the completion of the investigation, this information is not officially advertise.

 

 

Nevertheless, experts also do not exclude that the cause of the crash of the Il-18 aircraft several dozen kilometers from Tiksi could also be a technical malfunction of the aircraft, which has been actively operating since the 60s of the last century.

Moreover, on December 20, experts clarified that another of the most likely versions of the disaster could be an error in the piloting of the aircraft, however, given the fact that the pilot skillfully landed the aircraft, avoiding casualties, such an opinion is rather erroneous.

Experts believe that the causes of the accident will be known only after the decoding of flight recorders. Searches that are currently underway and.

 

Deaths and injuries

 

Despite the pre-emerging evidence that the crash occurred on the territory of Yakutia were no survivors, experts subsequently denied such information, noting that, in reality, none of the forty people on board died, however, are affected. As the unofficial sources, we are talking about 20 seriously injured people, most of whom have complex injuries of limbs, injuries and traumatic brain injuries.

As a result, now sit without legs and without hands. Burned or frostbitten. But, no one writes about this

Guys, what are you arguing about ?!
Military pilots must fly on military aircraft!
Working conditions on all types of aviation are different and they can not be compared! How can you compare the work of a pilot on a fighter and a pilot of a transport plane ?!
The qualification can not be determined only by the number of flights. In the world, a lot of disasters occur in a horizontal flight.
Andrew, where did you get the ratio 1: 8? The flight of 8 hours is a rare thing in civil aviation. On long-distance flights, it happens, but before getting on these flights, the pilot flew 5-6 thousand hours on second and third class aircraft. And there the duration of the flight is also 30 minutes.
Andrei, civilian pilots have always had classes in the same way. And if you are an 3 class pilot, you will not be the commander of the Tu-154 for anything.
Landing aircraft in Izhma, this, in your opinion, does not speak of the high qualification of the crew? There are many other examples. In any successful forced landing there is a share of luck. And to say, the merit of this crew, or not, you need to have full information.
But what military pilots have, in contrast to civilians, is a disregard for the flight manual. With such an overload as in Adler, civilian crews did not fly even in the dashing 90s. And the flight of the "dancing" Tu-154 also demonstrated the crew's ignorance of the Airplane Flight Manual.
So let's not argue. The specifics of the Air Force and the GA are different, their complexities and blaming each other in low qualification - this is at least illiterate!

Guys do not wear Nonsense. Both military KVSa (and Tupolev and Ilyushin-18) pilots 1-grade. And that says a lot. Boys experienced and landing IL-18 confirms it. And that's about the experience of civilian pilots, I would have said nothing. many do not mind sitting in the cockpit and include the toggle system (automatic flight control system, the automatic approach). Rumor has it that Boeing and Airbus even zarulivaet themselves. Guys, you are not ashamed to be called pilots ????

I want to disappoint you! The qualifications of the flight crew largely and even to a decisive extent depend on the hours spent flying by the crew; for military pilots, it is usually negligible. Experienced, according to the command of the entire detachment commander and the commander of the "Sochi" TU 154, 3000 hours on the TU and about 5000 total flight hours. The average flight time of a GA line pilot is 750-1000 flight hours per year. What an experience! And also, after the fall of the IL, there is no information either on board or on the crew! Mikhail is more careful in questions unfamiliar to you! And you shouldn't offend Vasya in vain.

The military pilots, as opposed to civilian pilots, the experience is usually determined klassnosti (pilot 1-grade) and the number of flights (landings). I have a flight over 28 years 5036 flights (landings). Plaque 2428chasov. This is an average raid a military pilot. I fly to Su-Su and 17-25. Multiply the average plaque civilian pilot somewhere 8 hours of flight, it turns out that in a civil raid at me somewhere around 40 000 flight hours. Something I have not seen a civilian pilots with an average bloom.

Totally agree with you. It is taking off and landing as the most critical phases of flight, form experience.
I am undergoing training as a pilot in an aero club, flying on a "conveyor belt", I have to perform 11-12 take-offs / landings per hour of flight. It turns out that my flying hour is not so little))

So what actually happened - a catastrophe (ie, are killed as a consequence of the accident flight) or accident (no dead)? Granted, there is a plane crash, but the event should be called exactly

So what actually happened - a catastrophe (ie, are killed as a consequence of the accident flight) or accident (no dead)? Granted, there is a plane crash, but the event should be called exactly

Yes netakoy reasons as bad weather!
And there are not-douchenny crew, allowed it to these conditions
Or - sloppiness crew polezshego in conditions below its tolerance.

That's all ...

And all these "difficulties" are weather - nothing more than an attempt to get someone out of punishment ... and - no more!

Vasily, you are not confused by the fact that the pilots landed the plane in a forest in bad weather and no one died! you know that military pilots are no match for civilians, they are far superior to them in all aspects! You are carrying some nonsense! there is such a proverb in Russia "Be quiet, you fool, you will pass for a clever one" Vasily and be silent.

Basil! I read your comments and am surprised! Well, will a non-commissioned officer's widow whip herself? and the Ministry of Defense, investigating its departmental accidents and disasters (pay attention, only the MO Commission, not the IAC) - in the event of SHAME RUDE crew miscalculations, WILL NOT TELL THE TRUTH. In this case, I can confidently assume that IL-18 No. 91821 there was a self-shutdown of all 4 engines, due to the complete production of fuel. It is to blame, to our bitter regret, the crew. the "warriors" had quite a lot.Unfortunately, my good friend and mentor FAC AN-12 G. Nikolay Mikhailovich (139th flight squad Yakutsk Directorate of GA) did not reach the runway of the OMSK-20 km airfield due to self-shutdown of all two AI-4M, but planned on the field, the crew was not injured, the plane was written off. Of course, the decoding of the MSRP and MS-20 of the aforementioned IL-61-ALL "EXPLAINED", but the commission of the Ministry of Defense made "its" CONCLUSIONS

Oh no ... the crew apparently did what I could, it's a flying coffin 60 years was

Pages

Blog and articles

upstairs