Rocket ARC Dagger

News

American experts called the ARC "Dagger" "Russian uselessness"

According to US military analysts, the Russian hypersonic missile is useless.

As the magazine "War is Boring" writes, the hypersonic missile X-47M2, developed and appeared in Russia's arsenal, which is a part of the "Dagger" air missile system, has no practical use. This is due, in the opinion of military experts, to the fact that cruise missiles are no different from aerial ballistic missiles and are capable of hitting target targets by no means with less efficiency.

"The United States, apparently, does not see value in the ballistic missile of air launch. The existing cruise missiles, which are already available to the US military in very large numbers, are perfectly capable of hitting a wide range of long-range targets ", - the publication "War is Boring" informs.

Independent analysts in turn consider the arguments of their American colleagues to be very unconvincing, which is primarily due to the fact that the key feature of the hypersonic missile is its inability to track and intercept, which makes it possible to deliver an accurate and powerful blow to the enemy from a distance of up to 2 thousand kilometers. This unique capability allows attacking aircraft carriers and destroying anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic missile systems, leaving the enemy unprotected before a subsequent attack, and given the US efforts to create hypersonic weapons, the published article most likely has nothing to do with reality.

Of course, it will not benefit Pindos, but only damage in the form of aircraft carriers on the ocean floor with numerous Afro and Euro pindosics ......))))))))))))

It's necessary to calm the public, what are they stupid !!

Back in 1975, the IL-76 from 3000 thousand meters perfectly fired off low-flying, slow-moving cruise missiles with its huge ammunition of air-to-air missiles.

this clown who wrote that we lagged behind America for 25 years left probably from the tundra where I read the 25-year-old newspapers a long time ago. that they then buy rocket engines from us, and fly on our rockets.

But did they really try to demonstrate the knock-off of these missiles on real aircraft carriers? Asked, I thought our would willingly agreed. And for some reason already in the United States there has been talk about curtailing programs for the construction of new aircraft carriers because of their vulnerability from these missiles. And why are all the world's queue behind our S-400, are they so backward?

Yes, we fell behind America for 25 years. How did you calculate? Are you special in technology? Do you have access to our and their technologies? 25 years ago in America, such a gentleman as Obama could not yet drive in one bus with the whites. Do not read to us their methodologies.

When you read the foolishness of a fool, then you do not want to argue with that. This is easier not to notice and then the stupidity God forbid is contagious ....

Radars can not yet track targets with speeds in 20 Makhov

Correctly said the experts. The dagger is knocked down and without difficulties. These are our producers touting their obsolete useless technologies in order to get the order and money for support from Putin! The dagger will not pass the US missile defense! Our technology has lagged behind US technology for 25 years, and more!

Americans seeing the futility of their scrap metal and using Goebbels' teachings about propaganda, now at every corner they shout about the uselessness of Russian weapons and just want to sell their useless scrap metal.

Dogadkin, he and in Africa Dogadkin))

Physics says the opposite. The inertia is the mass. The mass in flight does not change. Speed ​​increases maneuverability.

IMHO - only on a collision course. And then - if the ABM will have time to respond.

At the hypersonic speeds of the missile, taking into account the limited range of detection of the target by the missile defense system - it may simply not have enough time to respond to the capture of the target and the release of the antimissile system. Moreover, software algorithms for intercepting targets with such speeds hardly have anyone ...

The higher the speed of the object, the higher its inertia and lower maneuverability! So, on a counter course anti-missile it is much easier to intercept a high-speed object than to dodge an object from an anti-missile system! And when you exit the target, such a missile can be detected and intercepted by a conventional missile defense system located in the target area ...

Pages

.

Blog and articles

upstairs