Air strike on Aleppo

News

Russian "Pantsiri" failed to protect Aleppo from rocket attacks

The Syrian city of Aleppo was subjected to rocket fire from militants.

As follows from the news agency "RIA Novosti", the militants and armed opposition, occupying positions in the province of Ham, subjected the Syrian city of Aleppo to rocket fire. As a result of the attack, the child was killed and 13 civilians were seriously injured, according to the Syrian source, the Russian "Pantsir-S" complexes, transferred by the Syrian military, did not respond to the rocket attack.

According to preliminary data, all the missiles issued by the militants, and at least three missiles launched by special installations, fell on one street, and therefore it can be said that the bombardment of Aleppo was carefully planned. Moreover, the source claims that the missile attack on one of the largest cities in northern Syria was wiped out from the territory on which the Turkish military is currently stationed.

"Several rockets exploded on the outskirts of Nile Street. A child was killed. 13 people, women and men are injured ", the source said.

For some reason, the "Pantsir-S" missile system did not work, so far it remains unknown, but experts did not rule out that the systems could not even be deployed.

voobshchet as the Black Sea power, we have the right to pass through the straits by default)), Turkey can not let our ships only if it immediately declares war ... the results are so

Nonsense write. Shells, like any SAM have their own TTX - range, height, speed and low visibility of the target, the viewing angle and the number of charges. The 1 shell is the closest level of protection to the SAM, but 4x Shells are enough to repel an attack on the whole city. But, only for one attack. Next Shell needs to be recharged. Therefore, you must have not one and not 4 Shell, but at least 12 pcs. We must have reloading machines and stockpiles with rockets to them. So, it is necessary to have an entire infrastructure to ensure the security of the shell units and to provide with missiles and fuel. In short 1 Shell in the field is not a warrior. And since the Syrians, as a rule, slobs, then the readiness of the Shells to battle is very low. Without fuel Shell is also not fit for battle. On the batteries you can not get much.

The bad ones. not bad ?! A rigid, permanent system must function, then the selected or appointed individual people themselves will not play any role! The ideology of equality of citizens and strict organization, these are the fundamental bases of the system, over the entire structure the Law and "circular" control from top to bottom, violated, "get off the horse" and no excuses, violated, - answer and no excuses! Fair !?

Generally, "Armor" is designed and designed to protect specific objects. They simply won't be enough to place them on every quarter of every city, even if the city is at the forefront. Therefore, the task of repelling the shelling of the city is not worth it.

Yes-yes-yes ... Potsikov always bad boyars are guilty, bad crews, wrong hands, not there growing eggs, etc. Clowns are cotton)))

As a result of the attack, the child was killed and 13 civilians were seriously injured,
What are these people guilty of, so that they can release missiles on them ?!

PASSAGE OF MILITARY SHIPS THROUGH THE STRAITS IS CONTROLLED AND LIMITED, THIS AND FOR OTHER REASONS, YOU NEED TO KEEP THE GROUP THAT MAY BE MANEVERED AS IN MEDITERRANEAN, RED SEAS SO AND IN THE INDIAN OCEAN

Nicholas did you transfer the money?

What have the shells to do with it? "It wasn't about the bobbin ..."
It's one thing to transfer technology, and another - to be able to use it and not to sleep

Teach something taught. Only war there is different from war in our understanding. There, the war is negotiated. And a means of making money. The commander of the same shells was sent money and said. We will launch rockets there. And you close your eyes. This is necessary in order to obhayat Russian armament. He agreed. The loss of his fighters is gone. And the bombing of Aleppo and killing civilians, the militants did not achieve anything. Aleppo once already passed the same way. For money. Then our special forces took back. Soldiers are still those Syrians.

And why did Syria give up to us at all! We still do not know how to benefit from geopolitics. We are milked, and then sent. Forgiven 60 billion dollars to Cuba. Venezuela 3 billion .. How suckers constantly shoe.

It's always the same as usual, the newcomers are put and everything. On any complex, there is a six-month theory and then a year of practice. Video a lot as the Syrians are fighting, the same illiterate military as the militants, they shoot without looking queues, but Pontov as a special forces

And you that clever from patriots cheobs bacon? Do not kill yourself with drooling.

most likely the eastern "friend" leads us by the nose ..... and never when he was not seriously going to be friends with us .. he still pursues only his own interests .. the east is a delicate matter Petruha.

most likely it's a matter of misinformation ...

Where is the reference to RIA?

The question is not the shells but those who

Asia is Asia

Where are the cheers-patriots with the super-Russian defense weapons. The Kremlin and the Ministry of Defense without comment? Such funny - it's like in a video with an uncle vova about Syria - before whom you ** emerge ??

but how much good and good did the mighty Westle in Syria! here you and al-Qaeda, and IGIL, and theft of oil, and nominees for Nobel Pale coats with their staging shootings, and even the supply of all the weapons, equipment and anything they want, and the atmosphere of support for individual London Syrians in the media is simply off scale every likelihood.

Damn, Syrians complexes sold, and use to teach forgotten. I do not mean that something is bad on our part, but about the fact that it is time for the Sireis to understand that everything must be in a state of war in a war

Fighting near the Assad soldiers against the insurgents and jihadists financed by Turkey "Turkey has done a great deal of foolishness by financing the rebels, and now they have to sort out the consequences of their shortsightedness.Take out IGIL, I doubt that Erdogan would have been easier.The author justifies the many-thousand victims in Rakka and Iraqi Mosul, because, you see, Americans used "smart" bombs (including phosphates forbidden by the convention, such as the rules of "war" are allowed), and Russia does not aim. The West did not give convicted city corridors for those who want to escape hostages, Russia and Assad allow it to be done by everyone, moreover, the rebels who committed numerous crimes are offered a political way out of which they refuse, continuing terrorist attacks.The West, led by the US, took the side of illegal armed gangs, financed them , moreover, they committed a military intervention criminal under international rules, and now neither they want to answer for their crimes, they refuse to pay for the restoration of their destroyed country s. They provoked and supported the insurrection, which led to a large number of victims, that the IGIL grew, which the West was ready to admit. And now they blame Russia for having succeeded. Why Assad should tolerate the mass murderers of the civilian population who used chemical weapons, in which the West accused the Assad of the assault. Bastards can only reason from the point of view of the lost benefits of a failed crime. And how much oil did you steal under the noise of the unleashed conflict? Who will return, compensate for the stolen goods? Those who take refuge in Idlib do not want a peaceful life, they want to kill. So why should they be tolerated and not rewarded by their merit? There are no "peaceful" residents in Idlib, there are only irreconcilable terrorists thrown by the West to the mercy of fate and can only whine through false media. The author confessed, however, will be glad that the "peaceful" inhabitants of Idlib will not return to London, but let Putin do his dirty work. And the author will hypocritically wail over the lives of the murdered Igilovites. It would be better if they stayed forever in Idlib under the ruins, they would not have to catch them again all over the planet. Moreover, in this case, their financing by the West will continue. Because It is Chaos that is beneficial to the West, but far from its lawns. The article is a whining about the lost opportunities of the West to destabilize Russia.

Pages

.

Blog and articles

upstairs