C-400 has so far distinguished itself only in ostentatious polygon firing, in which the azimuth, height and time of the goal are known beforehand. Russia has nothing to do but spit on shit.

The author of the article is a great expert in missile defense. In Israel, every child knows that C-400 and the iron dome are designed for different purposes and the comparison is not correct. This is the same as comparing a Boeing and a bicycle, and both transport and vehicle

Correctly!! Hit (well, I'm in Israel), the complex of C-400 mortar shells

They can fire short-range missiles from Yemen or Iraq

The author of the article is a leaky one.
The iron dome is designed to intercept short-range missiles. And here is your unnecessary rubber C-400?

And I'm not special. I myself stood under the rockets that were shot down by the "iron dome". The assertion that the "dome" shoots down a small part of the missiles fired is based on the fact that only those missiles that fly into the protected area are shot down. That which does not reach or does not fly over does not go astray: let it fall on an empty area.

Apparently the editorial team hired a steep special analyst, Maksim SHEVCHENKO!

The toad certainly crushes. The "bad" triumph, which has never been used in combat conditions, is beautiful. The truth of the last century.

Unfortunately, no dome, even iron, Allah does not pereshibesh. Realizing this, Russians should not gloat or envy.

Experience is the son of difficult mistakes. Whether it is envy or anger of the author makes us draw unreasonable conclusions, we ourselves are witnesses of how the "Iron Dome" works. ERRORS WERE BUT IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE BRILLIANT WORK OF THE DOME - MINOR! I am interested in how the S-400 will shoot down a swarm of small short-range tactical missiles, mortar shells, because this system is intended for bigger targets!

Yeah, a specialist who compares two completely different systems for completely different tasks is very doubtful. It's like comparing a tractor and a racing car. It seems that both the internal combustion engine only has different tasks

The iron dome is excellent. The efficiency is very high.
All sorts of idiots think so, 300 missiles were fired at Israel, the Dome shot down-90. Therefore, it is "full of holes". But the Dome will only shoot down missiles that can cause serious damage by falling on residential areas or important infrastructure centers. Calculating the trajectory of missiles, he does not shoot down those that, for example, fall into the sea or in a desert area. And therefore it is necessary to count as follows: 50 of the 49 missiles flying along a dangerous trajectory were shot down, for example.
And I think the Saudis are not stupid and will never buy shit. Under no persuasions and guarantees. Not those people.

If only some nonsense to write. Another would be the "Iron Dome" with the C500 compared. "ZhK" is a system of short-range destruction, and the S400 has a prohibitive range today. And according to this stupid article, it turns out that, like, instead of a gun they bought a rifle because it is more effective ...

Lying would not be necessary. The iron dome perfectly copes with its tasks. However, what for he to Arabs? It is not designed to protect against the means of combat aviation, and from cruise missiles, too.

these pipets what special weapons,
no system in the world does not give 100 percent.