Ukraine is beneficial to NATO only by geographic location.

Despite the fact that the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko constantly declares that representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance intend to invite Ukraine to NATO as soon as possible, analysts believe that this will happen no sooner than in two decades. In fact, Ukraine is beneficial for NATO only by its geographical position, but the country on the territory of which military operations are conducted, which does not have powerful air forces, where corruption is developed, and the economy is almost completely destroyed, is simply not interested in NATO.

Against the background of the fact that the next "talks" of Ukraine and the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance failed, the former chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Igor Romanenko, completely declared that the blame was Russia, which prepared European leaders and NATO members to prevent these events.

“Putin agreed with Frau Merkel and they did everything so that neither Ukraine nor Georgia would receive a membership action plan”, - declared Romanenko on the air of the TV channel “ZIK”.

However, Georgia is much more interesting to the North Atlantic alliance than Ukraine.

“Georgia is much smaller than Ukraine, but this country does not have such corruption as in Ukraine, and although this country cannot yet secure NATO membership due to the impossibility of transferring part of the funds to the North Atlantic Alliance fund, NATO is closely cooperating with Georgia. As for Ukraine, this country can indeed become a NATO member, but definitely after Georgia, and not earlier than two decades later. What can Ukraine offer NATO now? A dump of broken aircraft? Accidentally exploding ammunition depots? It's not a fact that in twenty years Ukraine will have this too ", - emphasizes the specialist.