Kerch incident

News

The UN believes that Ukraine lawfully invaded Russian waters

The UN Tribunal sided with Ukraine in the case of the incident in the Kerch Strait.

Interfax reports that the United Nations International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea made a decision on the incident in the Kerch Strait that happened on November 24 of the year 2018. It provides that Russia must return to Ukraine the 24 seaman detained during the incident, and three warships.

The decision of the tribunal also said that Moscow and Kiev should refrain from measures that may aggravate the dispute over this incident. In addition, before 25 June, the parties must provide court reports on events in the strait.

Benjamin Benirshke, chairman of the court press service, said that the Russian delegation was not present at the meeting held in Hamburg. European Truth reports that, as the Tribunal’s chairman, Park Jin Hyun, stressed, the absence of a party to a dispute cannot be an obstacle to a decision being made.

The military boats Berdyansk and Nikopol, as well as the tugboat Yana Kapu, were detained by the border department of the FSB of Russia on November 25, 2018 in the Kerch Strait region. The ships crossed the Russian border. Not responding to demands to stand, they maneuvered dangerously. Moscow called the actions of the Ukrainian side a provocation. On the basis of a criminal case for violating the state border, 24 Ukrainian sailors were arrested. In Kiev, these actions were called an act of military aggression.

What not to download? Have fun, Russia regained the Crimea. He never hohlyatsky and was not! And in tsarist Russia and the USSR. He was illegally transferred (without documents!) Khokhlov only in 1956! And you will arise! Restoring the Soviet Union! Since the documents about his breakup were not legally signed!
And in general, say thanks to the great Lenin! He created hohlomordia in 1918! And before that, it was the outskirts of Tsarist Russia! And not Ukraine! In the old Russian outskirts and Ukraine the same thing! Here you have more proof of ownership of the Crimea of ​​Russia. Which was conquered by Tsarist Russia and Potemkin! And not the Ukrainians. Even Gogol wrote in Russian and ridiculed the parochial, read Ukrainian, language!
So quickly put your tongues in your ass and keep quiet!

According to international law, and not the opinion of western whores, Crimea completely legally became independent and became part of the Russian Federation. Therefore, to invade the territory of Russia with arms in its hands is fraught with consequences, and no court will forbid us to protect our territorial waters.

The ships invaded the territory of Russia. This is proven by the geolocation of the incident.
But now we have a different situation. We now have no agreement with Ukraine. No contract on boundaries. But Russia still observes it. Let them show an agreement on borders agreed with Russia in Ukraine. He is now gone. Ukraine itself is to blame for this.

According to international law, Crimea legally reunited with Russia. And the fact that every tribunal there does not recognize this fact and makes absurd decisions is their misfortune and shamelessness ...

Ukrainian ships violated the border of the Russian Federation, which was long before the reunification of the Crimea. Therefore, the Ukrainian side should be responsible for this provocation.

No need to return, feel weakness, finally can sit on your back!

According to international law, the Crimea is the territory of Ukraine, respectively, de jure, the Ukrainian ships were in their territorial waters. What surprises you this decision?

By jumping and galloping on jumping! Practically this world of the Anglo-Saxon principles of homosyatka and Russia on this world of bacchanalia and the triple standards of which, and Ukraine-pig farm, wants to adhere to-SPIT!

Do you think so too?
In the XVII century, Ukraine became part of the Russian Empire.
Since the XVIII century Crimea is officially part of the Russian Empire.
In the 1954 year, in honor of the 300 anniversary of the reunification of Ukraine with Russia, the Crimean region (KASSR) was attached to the administrative management of the Ukrainian region (UkrSSR). Within ONE COUNTRY (!), One region was attached under the administrative control of another.
In the 2014 year, under the influence of the West, in Kiev, there was an illegal, forcible change of power - a well-planned coup d'état (Euromaidan), under the control of security forces.
Ukraine is now controlled from the outside. This is vividly illustrated by the fact that Joe Biden (at that moment, the Vice-President of the United States) was sitting in the presidential seat (there is a photo) in the Supreme Rada. And he literally made Petro Poroshenko change the prosecutor general and cooperate with Arseniy Yatsenyuk.
Residents of Donbass and Crimea refused to obey those who committed the coup d'état.
In March, the overwhelming majority of Crimean residents in 2014 declared in a referendum that they wanted to be with Russia. That is - to return.
Who does not understand? What kind of return is it? So - whose is this ter. water?

And who said that they invaded the territorial waters of the Russian Federation?
Virtually the whole world considers them ter. waters of Ukraine.

You do not need to try anything, this is the lot of those who are not far away. They climb up, go to the snout, and let them cluck if they like.

In principle, before the Crimea was reintroduced into Russia, when the agreements were still respected (though not all by Ukraine), the shipping part of the Kerch Strait passed, in essence, on Russian territory. Next, you should consider at least 3 additional fact.
1. The transfer of Crimea to Ukraine in 1954 was not an eligible act from an international point of view, it was a transfer of a subject within one state, from an international point of view, Crimea remained Russian.
2. According to the constitution of the autonomous republic of Crimea, adopted in 1992, the citizens of Crimea had the full right to determine the ownership of Crimea independently. Yushchenko in 2008 annulled this constitution alone, to which he had no (!) Right. Accordingly, this constitution is still in force, because the population of Crimea has not abolished it.
3. After the Maidan in 2013-2014, there was a violent change of power, which implies the right of all entities that previously made up this state to decide with whom to stay.
In short, whatever one may say, namely, according to the UN regulations, Crimea is Russian, and its territorial waters also belong to Russia.

State border, sovereignty is not within the competence of the tribunal. It is noteworthy that similar decisions of the tribunal were on Panama, Nicaragua to which the United States put a bolt.

Absolutely shores lured bespredelschiki!

The UN is contained on state money and other things to expect from him naively. And the position of China, India and other countries that could but did not want to influence the results of the voting is similar to the position of Russia, which at one time refrained from vetoing the invasion of Yugoslavia.

Russia should attempt to invade the territorial waters of Germany and the United States and see what the reaction of the court of international maritime law will be.

Pages

.

Blog and articles

upstairs