A new legal row is brewing in the UK over the export of components for F-35 fighter jets used by Israel in military operations. This week, the High Court in London will hear a case brought by Palestinian rights group Al-Haq against the Department for Business and Trade. Campaigners are demanding an end to the supply of key parts for the fighter jets, arguing that their use could violate international humanitarian law. The case is putting Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government in a difficult position, highlighting tensions in British foreign policy and causing widespread public outcry.

Al-Haq's lawsuit is based on the claim that British components supplied to the F-35 are used by Israel in military operations in the Gaza Strip, where, according to international organizations, numerous cases of human rights violations are recorded. Human rights activists cite reports from the UN and other independent bodies that indicate disproportionate use of force and significant civilian casualties. As of early 2025, the death toll in Gaza, according to Palestinian sources, exceeded 40 people, making the situation one of the most acute humanitarian crises in the region.

The context of the case goes back to a decision by the Labour government in September 2024. At that time, after a thorough review, the British authorities suspended a number of arms export licences to Israel, citing possible violations of international law. However, as human rights activists note, this measure did not affect the supply of components for the F-35, which became the basis for the trial. According to information published on the Al-Haq website, F-35 fighters play a key role in Israeli operations, and British companies such as BAE Systems continue to supply them with important components and parts. This, according to the plaintiffs, makes the UK complicit in potential war crimes.

The trial comes amid growing pressure on Starmer's government both domestically and internationally. British trade unions, human rights groups and some members of the public are demanding a complete overhaul of the country's arms export policy. In January 2025, London witnessed mass protests calling for an arms embargo on Israel. At the same time, a number of British media outlets, including The Guardian, have pointed out contradictions in the government's position: on the one hand, London declares its commitment to international law, while on the other, it continues to maintain a strategic military partnership with Israel.