adopted for service on October 4, 1971.

The Ukrainian press writes about Ukrainian technology.

The media, like all politicians, are amateurs. The only difference is that the former launch a lie without checking, while the latter do it with the support of advisors. Goodbye avia.pro. I'm not interested anymore.

why no comment? from this video, I think that whoever wrote this article is an enemy of Russia. it can be seen that the power supply unit was shot down by the first missile and when the second one approached, it already randomly falls in a spin; the second one, I think, also hit

Putin's rubbish, he is rubbish in Africa. Even of the vaunted Iskandr, one in ten exploded, and even that one did not hit the target.

Everything is sad with you.

Here the optical marker is definitely not an aspen one, even in the video you can see how a wasp enters, if it is a Wasp at all, a remote fuse does not hit the target, but overtakes and detonates when the target profile is maximum, and even taking into account that the target is a group one. The headline seems to be purely provocative, to attract a Russian-speaking audience. And where from the video it is clear that the target is Bayraktar, and from the video it is not at all clear that it is Wasp. Everything is at the level of conjectures and half-hints, with the expectation of an IQ level of no more than 30 for the public.

Once there was the beginning. calculation of Wasps BM2. Something I don’t remember such markers on TOV, is this generally Wasp ???

where is it and who was shooting at them with a wasp?

the drone is shot down by the first missile. The second is on the fragments.
Just a shame on all the comments.

Yes exactly! the second rocket caught up with the falling drone already in the bushes ..)))

Is a negative experience also an experience?

If the missile did not hit directly, it exploded nearby and caused irreparable damage to this device. And he began to fall. The second had nothing to knock down.

indeed, after the first missile, the target falls, visible in the clouds. So the target is shot down from the first missile!

First, "Bayraktar" can not repel the strike of the missile defense system! It's just that the rocket did not capture the target (the old 9M33 rocket, as a fact and the complex of the still Soviet configuration), the radio fuse is designed to be triggered when capturing a target with a greater EPR ... The 9M333 rocket can handle this "bayrakher" easily !!!

Well, yes, everything is correct people write that although the "Wasps" and the ancient air defense systems of the 60s and 70s of development and production, but the advertised Turk, in this video, the rocket still shot down on the first try. And the admins should change the title and not mislead people about some kind of electronic warfare equipment on these Turkish drones and our imperfect or ineffective air defense equipment and systems, even such old ones like these "Wasps"! Although, without exception, all experts in the world, on the contrary, recognize the leadership and advantages of Russian air defense systems, over similar analogues of the development and production of other countries.

The article is false. First "Wasp" shot down "Barak" "Wasp" is allowed to couples. The second falling one tore like a hot-water bottle tuzik.

you can fight with a wasp - you have learned it, but with this it is useless - MANPADS - "Verba", it does not react to target maneuvers to passive and active interference, it performs the task - right on target

It is not clear which Wasp, and where they shot down? If the Wasp is old, not modernized, no wonder. And if modernized, it's sad ...

This is a movie from the series "eyewitnesses" shoot UFOs. Always disgusting quality, indistinct sounds, etc. In general, this "material" is a fake!

The Osa air defense missile system was developed at the end of the 60s of the last century to provide cover from an air attack for forward forces. Works on targets with high ESR. When it was being developed, aircraft such as UAVs with low ERA did not yet exist. Now in the Russian army, for cover, there are "Thor" and "Pantsir". "Wasp" remained only in Svidomo, and then, strongly "overdue". Comparing "Osu" and "Bayraktar" is like comparing a steam locomotive and an electric locomotive. PS This shoot looks like a commercial for Turkish flying cockroaches.

You mean missed? The first hit and the drone began to rotate while falling.

Wasp development of the 60s.
The ceiling is 5000, while the drones have 8000.
What is generally not clear.
Write more that bayraktars do not go astray from the slingshots either.
Some kind of kindergarten ...

What kind of homing does Wasp have? The author is you ....!

Eka unprecedented :))) - the 40-year-old air defense system could not shoot down a modern drone. Why is it not said whose air defense system? Obviously not Russian - we just don't have them in Syria, the government forces of Syria have them, and we don't seem to have anywhere else to "meet" the bayraktar, at least not where ...

from the first I left beautifully, from the second in my opinion I could not leave and went down .. For the video, respect !!!

Oleg Lukyanov, a military-political observer of the IANED agency, points out: “The video is, of course, spectacular, but why the missiles launched were identified from the Osa air defense system is not clear. However, this air defense complex, created almost half a century ago, was not designed to combat targets with low ESR, such as modern drones. In addition, the Osa missiles can target objects flying no higher than 5 km from the earth's surface. If Bayraktar TB2 flew higher, then it was simply technically impossible to get it with the Wasp. Such cases took place, for example, during the war in Nagorno-Karabakh, when Turkish-made drones managed to effectively destroy the Armenian "Wasps" from a height of more than 6 km, which did not reach them. But they shot down American Tomahawk cruise missiles in Yugoslavia in 1999 quite effectively. "

And what do you want from an air defense system developed over 50 years ago !?

Did they shoot from a horse at a gallop? Something I did not notice the target lock

BP shot down by the first missile, you can see how it falls in a tailspin when the second one flies towards it

The Wasps dropped this Barack normally. According to the instructions, it is supposed to start up at the rocket, the first one worked at a distance, the second wasp shot down. Wishful thinking, fans.

the complex of the 70s tried to bring down modern technologies

there was nothing new

Judging by the footage, the UAV was shot down by the first missile. The second did not keep up with the falling bayraktar.

In the presented video frames, you can see how the anti-aircraft guided missile launched by the Osa anti-aircraft missile system ... explodes at a distance of guaranteed destruction of the drone. The second missile fired at the falling drone does not have time to hit Bayraktar, as he crashes into the ground. Someone really wanted to hyip on the headline, gentlemen.

It seemed to me alone that the device was falling after the first missile?

It is enough to install an ordinary cheap smartphone with a video camera on the rocket and the drone cannot dodge.

We have only in cartoons, but narrow-minded people, have the best weapons in the world, but in fact they are solid noodles!

Is it okay that this video clearly shows that this drone is falling? And who didn't hit whom?