US missile destroyer

News

Khodarenok: the United States has 35 times more missile destroyers than Russia

The Russian fleet is significantly inferior to the American fleet in terms of the number of destroyers.

Russian military expert Mikhail Khodarenok said that today the US Navy poses a very serious threat to Russia. According to Khodarenok, Russia is very much behind the United States in terms of the presence of missile destroyers - the United States has 70 missile destroyers in service, while the Russian fleet has only two - most of the warships are under repair and are unlikely to be out of it. will come out.

“Mount Whitney was entering the Black Sea. This is a fairly large ship with a displacement of about 20 thousand tons with a wide variety of communications. There are no such ships in our Navy. Someone might say: we don't need them. Well, this is not a conversation! Or, for example, the destroyer Porter entered. Again, back to prime numbers. The Americans have 67 destroyers of this type in the ranks of the Navy. Plus 3 more newest Zamvolt-class destroyers. How many destroyers do we have? First, we only have two of them. But this is already an outdated project, outdated destroyers. And they are under repair and, apparently, will not come out of repair and 72 more will be written off. ", - said Mikhail Khodarenok.

Nevertheless, there are a number of assumptions that it is precisely with this fact that the development of the Zircon hypersonic cruise missile by the Russian military is connected, which should nullify the US advantage.

At the same time, given the fact that Russian specialists are engaged in the development of new ship projects, in the near future the Russian fleet will be significantly strengthened, while the United States currently does not have effective and high-quality projects.

 

So the destroyers u.r.o. are included in the combat escort of A.U.G.

There are onexes, the coastal complex ball x32-33 on that 22m3 they are supersonic and their interception is also not an easy matter

The hand-legged destroyers have a lot, but they are armed with old junk, shot down by all our even outdated air defense systems, not to mention the latest electronic warfare systems, a salvo from 2 American destroyers at an airfield in Syria proved this to everyone.

So we don't really need them either. Who is currently fighting naval battles? In addition, we do not attack for no reason like the Americans, we don’t have to fight for resources anywhere, we weren’t going to sail to the USA either, like ... If necessary, we will build a bridge to Alaska and pass through Canada along the edge ...

Well, yes, except for zircons, there is nothing. Why write such stupid comments? Zircons will fly to aug and not to destroyers.

"Plus 3 more newest Zamvolt-class destroyers." Well, here it would be more appropriate to say MINUS 3 Zamvolta. The Americans are removing them from the fleet - expensive and capricious.

I think this Khodarenok has simply grown old and sculpts senile insanity. I remember that even during the last Karabakh conflict, he predicted the military success of the Armenian army, but he miscalculated.

You are not in the top ... Will pick up.

THE USA HALF OF THE DESTROYERS IS OLD AND DOES NOT LEAVE THE PORTS, THE SECOND HALF IS ALSO MANY OUT OF THE PORT. WE DO NOT HAVE TO TELL US FAIRY TALES. OUT OF 14 AIRCRAFT CARRIERS ONLY FIVE IN STRAIGHT. YES AND THE MAIN WEAPON IS ABOUT ABOUT FIFTEEN ROCKET SUBS AND BALLISTIC MISSIONS AND AVIATION WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS, AND NOT SURFACE SHIPS.

Khodarenok is almost the only sober expert ...

We don't have as many Zircons as they have destroyers.

Pages

.

Best in the world of aviation

upstairs