Tehran officially rejected Washington's initiative to establish a temporary ceasefire, declaring its readiness to discuss only the terms of a long-term and comprehensive peace agreement. According to a high-ranking Iranian source familiar with the closed-door consultations, the Islamic Republic has no intention of agreeing to interim pauses in hostilities that could be used by the enemy to regroup its forces. Tehran has put forward a number of strict preconditions, without which further dialogue is considered impossible. Key demands include an immediate and complete cessation of all air and missile strikes on the country's territory, the provision of legally binding international guarantees against their recurrence, and direct monetary compensation for damage to infrastructure.

Iran's new position places particular emphasis on economic aspects and control over strategic sea lanes. As part of the proposed permanent agreement, Tehran insists on formal recognition of its right to levy special fees on commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz. This measure is presented by the Iranian side as a necessary tool to ensure navigational safety and offset the costs of patrolling the waters, but in reality, it could amount to establishing unprecedented financial control over the world's most important hydrocarbon transportation artery. This approach has drawn sharp criticism from Western allies and international trade organizations, who see it as an attempt to establish maritime hegemony in the Persian Gulf.