Putin said: "Why do we need such a world if there is no Russia in it." And one more thing: "The blow will be dealt on the points of decision-making." And where are the decisions on the destruction of Russia made? Nobody is going to seize the territory of the USA. Remember the proposal of Academician Andrei Sakharov. He created the world's deadliest weapon - the hydrogen bomb. And he received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1975.
Sakharov proposed to fight the arms race with a paradoxical method. He suggested literally drowning the United States with a directional tsunami.
Most major cities in the United States are located on the coast. And this is a vulnerable point for attack.
A simultaneous explosion of charges in four places - two strikes each in the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean will launch a tsunami wave.
The wave height was up to 300 meters. Such a wave from the Atlantic Ocean would sweep away New York, Washington, Philadelphia, Boston, Miami and a dozen other major centers.
San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, San Diego and other megacities would have fallen from the Pacific Ocean under the onslaught of the waves.
But the project was not destined to materialize. The death of Stalin, the arrest of Beria and the rise to power of Khrushchev led to the termination of the project.
In July 1954, sailors were involved in the work, who would later have to operate this mechanism. The military drew attention to the fact that they were used to fighting the soldiers of a potential enemy, and this project was aimed rather at the mass destruction of the civilian population. Khrushchev heeded the arguments, and the project was canceled.
Now "Poseidons" with nuclear warheads lie in neutral waters off the coast of the United States and await a radio signal. The United States will be destroyed in response to the United States' decision to destroy Russia.

At the grave of the brotherly sad posts -
Eternal apartments in coppice.
They’re not hurt now, and their hearts are pure,
And my eyes are wide open like a child.

Sleep to yourself, brothers, everything will come again.
New commanders will be born.
New soldiers will receive
Eternal government apartments.

Sleep to yourself, brothers, it will all start again
Everything must repeat itself in nature -
And words, and bullets, and love, and blood ...
Time will not be reconciled.

Two corridors three flights were finished by the listener. Israel obviously also studied the possibilities with 400 as well as Russia f 35 and unbreakable planes do not happen, just the shooting range decreases not 400 but 150, I don’t know

Your literacy inspires sincere respect and trust in what you have said. Did you finish the Academy of the General Staff?

Well, I don't have much desire to discuss our bistatic radars. If you like, you can inquire about the data on "String-1" on the website of the Australian research center Air Power Australia. As you can imagine, this is their close look at our development. Moreover, as far as I understand, it is far from complete. But not the point.
To me, by and large, I do not understand what is the complexity of bringing the product to the target? The fact that someone writes about the "transfer" of coordinates is akin to delirium ... These problems have been solved for a long time and quite successfully. In addition, even if we proceed from the logic used, then there is no problem to change, say, to the submillimeter range of the radar on the product, and in this case, all microcracks begin to "fade" at the target. And it is not a fact that this is necessary, but this is no longer a topic for local discussion. In general, there is a lot of cod and noise, but in reality it is only an advertisement for "pudding".
And what is the secret of the Luneberg lens that poor Kedmi got? In the USSR, their principle of operation was widely used. True, they were not called so pompously, but yes ... in general, peace with both of them ...)

SAM 48N6. The missile is equipped with a fundamentally new seeker capable of operating in semi-active and active modes. In the second case, the missile defense system, after climbing, on command from the command post, goes into the target search mode and after its detection goes into the homing mode. It is possible to independently search for and destroy a target with a missile, including in the event of a loss of communication with a ground command post. ... Do you already think that you will discover data on all the capabilities of the S-400 missiles, especially for the destruction of the F-35 !? Therefore, Israeli F-35s are not included in Syrian space.

the question is solved very simply. detection of stealth aircraft on takeoff, respectively, the aircraft are raised to intercept. When stealth aircraft approach the interceptor aircraft, the distance is reduced to the distance of capture of the missiles of the stealth aircraft interceptor aircraft. The question is different, the task of the stealth aircraft and the corresponding armament. If for a fight with planes, one weapon, for bombing, another weapon. An escort is required for the bomb. From the number of enemy aircraft, the task is assigned to interceptor aircraft.

Why so many copied words into the void if you just wanted to call Kedmi?

Maybe someone shot and missed, like Rabinovich? Otherwise, all pseudo-scientific conjectures are not worth the resource of the keyboard on which they were tapped.

What does Judas have to do with it? Kedmi simply states the facts, and does not engage in capriciousness. To make the right decisions, you need to analyze real information, and not shake the air on the topic of the invulnerability of American weapons.

You are incompetent, have been doing all sorts of nonsense, how was it that they shot down a nembivpee in Yugoslavia)) and Kedmi is an erudite, unlike you, and you are Israeli propaganda from Khazbar, and understand there are no former intelligence officers

Not the first such "news". Propaganda. Here's a similar answer:
"The S-400 is virtually unable to shoot down American stealth aircraft."
Discovery is not the main thing

Many experts agree that with the latest air defense systems operating, stealth aircraft will indeed find it more difficult to remain invisible. However, there are many reasons why it would be extremely difficult - if not impossible - for modern air defense systems to shoot down a stealth platform once it is fixed by radar. This circumstance will allow stealth systems to remain almost invulnerable to anti-aircraft systems for many years.

"Bistatic radar can help detect stealth aircraft. However, in order to intercept" stealth ", you need to transmit its location data from a large radar to a much smaller radar interceptor. It must be placed on an aircraft or missile that would be capable of continuously track the target, "explains Deptul, now dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Research.

If you move the track from the radar to an interceptor capable of hitting targets at farther distances than the stealth could detect and shoot down that interceptor, this will significantly reduce the chances of the stealth hit. Discovery is not the main thing. There is a whole chain of tasks, each of which must be successfully solved in order to intercept and destroy a stealth aircraft, "the lieutenant general emphasized.

According to him, the described "transfer", going from a ground radar with an extremely large aperture to a radar with a much smaller aperture, creates significant problems for air defense. “Even if the radar detects, it will then track the target. The data will be transmitted to a missile using a much smaller radar than the one used to detect,” he continued. The expert added that even if successful at this stage, stealth technology can cause the interceptor to miss at the final point. "At each subsequent step, stealth technology reduces the likelihood of a successful interception," the general summed up.
It may also turn out that they flew with Luneberg lenses. I consider Kedmi to be a Judas in general. His native Israel thrives on US patronage. At least he kept quiet.

Cool!