2021-03-23
News
Russian fighter jet destroys more than 10 Turkish armored personnel carriers in Idlib
A Russian fighter attack destroyed more than ten Turkish armored personnel carriers.
After a large-scale missile and bomb strike by the Russian Su-34 fighter jet on jihadist positions in northwestern Syria, it became known that the key target of the Russian Aerospace Forces was not the trucks that were here and smuggled oil trade, but Turkish armored vehicles, which turned out to be at the disposal of terrorists. The destroyed Turkish AVC-15 armored personnel carriers accidentally fell into the frame taken from an unmanned aerial vehicle, however, only one frame was enough to identify the destroyed Turkish armored vehicles.
In the presented photo in the hangar, you can see vehicles on tracked chassis, which were identified as AVC-15 armored personnel carriers. In total, there were at least 10 armored personnel carriers transferred to the jihadists by the Turkish side in the hangar, and judging by the scale of the strike by the Russian Su-34 fighter, the latter received critical damage and cannot be used in hostilities.
Experts draw attention to the fact that recently, strikes by the Russian and Syrian military have been carried out on jihadist positions to destroy fuel and lubricant depots, but it is likely that Turkish armored vehicles were also eliminated in recent attacks, which makes it possible to prevent jihadists from attempting to attack the SAA.
Last news:
Recent Articles:
Latest Video:
.
In this context, calling IT a fighter is wrong! The IBA is, in fact, stormtroopers!
Turkey does not have such armored vehicles under the AVC-15 index. There are ACV-15 armored vehicles. Something in the photo I can't determine where they are. The arrows (top) point to a wall that does not in any way look like an armored vehicle. and the rest also point to anything, but not to the ASM-15. Hence the conclusion - the photo is fake and the article itself is fake.
Nonsense. What are they? Are they officially broadcast? And cut the ribbon! Prohibited by world laws.
Turkey has become insolent, so Russia decided to show who is the boss in Syria, and that's why they hit the Turkish military equipment that they give to the terrorists. The Turks generally need to be reminded more often of the Battle of Molodino in 1572. As for the reasoning about why there are no bomb craters, they should not be. Now the bombs are completely different - vacuum ones, they do not leave funnels, but they burn out everything. And rockets all the more do not leave craters, because they explode above the ground, and do not fall on it. The Turks will not be able to answer us, because Russia in Syria blocked the entire sky, there is our base not only in Khmeimin, but also in the north and east of Syria, and at all - the most powerful electronic warfare, you cannot fly up to them at all. That is why our people are so calmly bombing the Turks. And then there are some weapons that are not mentioned anywhere at all. Russia in Syria protects not so much this country, but also tests the latest weapons ...
Before you teach someone, you'd better have a look on the Internet yourself, Su-34, this is a BOMBER-BOMBER, a smart guy. So you better study the materiel.
If these were Turkish cars, then Turkish F-16s would have arrived and would also have to look at them. our airbase.
because they burned out, and it is not necessary to use primitive bombs, which explode from contact with an object, explodes at a height, fragments scatter and destroy everything. but there could be incendiary cluster bombs, no craters and more area, it is easier for one aircraft to do this
Yuri, fighters have specializations - interceptor, frontline, conquest of dominance, bomber, radio-technical reconnaissance.
So the Su-34 is a fighter-bomber. Wikipedia thinks the same.
The SU-34 is a bomber, not a fighter. The author, well, at least climb into Wikipedia.
As for the lack of bomb craters. ODAB has not yet been canceled.
Dear in the army, it was necessary to serve, not serve ...
Vladimir, you are right. Nobody bombed. There are no funnels. The cabins are intact. Probably the militants themselves ruined everything and the Russian Aerospace Forces had nothing to do with it.
you understand what's the matter, many rockets and bombs explode at a certain height from the ground to cover a large area with shrapnel!
"destroyed" from overheating. Who will drive them to the repair plant?
Cluster munitions were most likely used. They do not leave funnels
This is done in a spaced way so as not to bend the cabs and leave no craters. We covered the equipment with kerosene and ignited it.
Who stores fuels and lubricants next to equipment.
If it was the most powerful missile bombing strike, then why is the crater not visible? Can't see the epicenter of the explosion? Why did the truck cabins (made of 0,9 mm tin) survived and the armored personnel carriers in the shelter were suddenly destroyed?
Pages