News

Syria first attacked Israeli F-35 fighter jet during attempted attacks on Damascus

For the first time, Syrian air defense systems opened fire on an Israeli F-35.

The news agency Avia.pro obtained information that Syrian air defense systems opened fire on at least one Israeli F-35 fighter during an attempt to strike the suburbs of Damascus. We are talking about the very S-200 air defense system, the fired rocket of which flew to the southern part of Israel.

Experts substantiate their arguments by the fact that, unlike other missiles fired at Israeli aircraft, the latter not only did not self-destruct, but also successfully pursued its goal, and given that the Nevatim airbase is located in the south of Israel, the latter, by the way, is located only 20-30 kilometers from the nuclear research center in Dimona, in the area of ​​which the S-200 air defense missile system fell, experts believe that the attack was carried out precisely on the Israeli F-35 fighter returning to the airbase.

Even taking into account the fact that the information provided by the Israeli military is partially classified, experts believe that this is the first time that Syria has attacked Israeli F-35s.

“According to the investigation, part of which is still confidential, the Syrians fired about 10 heavy anti-aircraft missiles S-200 air defense missile systems at Israeli aircraft. By the grace of God, no one was hurt. All missiles continued on their trajectory without causing damage. These missiles have a mechanism that makes the missile explode on its own if it misses the target, which is why most missiles exploded on their own, with the exception of one missile. ", - reports the Israeli news publication "NZIV" referring to sources in the Israeli defense department.

Taking into account the rather limited capabilities of the Syrian S-200 air defense systems, experts do not exclude that the Syrian army could use more powerful radars, for example, Russian ones.

And from the fact that hundreds of thousands of Kyrgyz work in Russia, there is no benefit from this either? I doubt it.

If it were not for Russia, they would have given even more land, and even IK to boot.

Yes, yes, Sadyr. The "further away", the better for the RF and .. China. How much Kyrgyz land has already been given to the Chinese?

Right. EAEU CSTO CU is polit. the union is not needed by anyone except the Russian Federation. We need to live further away from backward Russia

yeah and enter into an alliance with Turkey, which will deceive it in the same way (((

Yes, and return the guest workers home!

And how does Ali know what is good for Kyrgyzstan and what is not? Does he work as President or Prime Minister?

Ali, these wild antics on the border, first sticks and stones, then weapons (Russian by the way) - is this the potential for a future progressive, educated, morally and socially healthy society without an alliance with backward Russia?

We believe that the Kirghiz wrote it! Queen of Britain Hello!

Long live Uzbekistan !!!
)))

Kyrgyzstan must withdraw from all the ODBK, SCO, Euroses and so on, which are a deception and a mechanism for the implementation of Russian projects, from these structures for Kyrgyzstan there is not the slightest benefit except harm

Pages

.

Blog and articles

upstairs