US special services: Russia drowned a missile with a nuclear engine

2018-08-22

News

US special services: Russia drowned a missile with a nuclear engine

The Russian missile with a nuclear engine lies at the bottom of the Barents Sea.

The American television channel CNBC, referring to a source in the US special services, said that the latest Russian Burevestnik missile equipped with a nuclear power plant, during the tests conducted in 2017, was accidentally sunk in the Barents Sea.

According to the representatives of the American special services, an unsuccessful test launch led to the missile's loss of control, and, flying only 35 kilometers, fell in the Barents Sea - its exact location remains unknown, but it is reported that Russia is preparing a special operation to lift the missile unlimited flight range, planning to use for this three ships.

It should be clarified that no official comments on this matter from the Russian military department have yet been received, but this is far from the first statement that the Russian military conducted unsuccessful tests of one of the types of unique weapons, but to what extent these information correspond to reality, so far what remains unknown.

It should be noted that if Russia really failed the Burevestnik missile tests and drowned it in the Barents Sea, this creates a huge threat to the region's ecology, since the nuclear power plant could well get serious damage and the risk of radiation contamination is extremely high.

Add a comment

a guest 02 September 2018 in 16: 38

The "throw" tests are underway. The operation of the starting and accelerating engines is checked. For this,
overall weight layout. They put an accelerating engine on it and start it. Has worked, the model falls into the sea, throws out the float. They catch him, put the accelerating engine and start again. And so on until the launch scheme is completed. They will work out the launch from ground-based PU, from ship PU. from submarines, from planes. You will see many "failed starts"
And I roll with you when the couch exPerds are jumping for joy over "unsuccessful launches". Especially when
A rocket is called a simple blank, or rather a weight-weight model.

GS 22 2018 in August 17: 12

I understand that you are a specialist and an expert in nuclear missile technology? Or are you just suffering from a gallbladder disease? And why the time period of the flight, which you specified, namely 10 hours?

Someone 22 2018 in August 16: 36

+ Shaman A may be enough to believe all the unconfirmed stuffing. All sorts of experts got divorced here - they don't know a part of the mate, but they still continue to climb. Even the exact characteristics are unknown. The rocket (torpedo) has a nuclear engine, so it moves for several days. "but yen allow materials" What? By your logic, even submarines have a shelf life of 10 hours.

Chinik 22 2018 in August 13: 50

If a rocket with a nuclear engine was drowned in the sea already in 2017 why they are now shouting that such missiles do not happen? And from where do they know that this is such a rocket?

Shaman 22 2018 in August 13: 20

Why I'm not surprised ... Probably because we unassisted everything through the ass. These stupid fairy tales that a rocket can fly a few days already amuse everyone. Yes, the engine allows, but the En allow materials, from the power of the 10 clock, no more ...