VKS Russia

News

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation has rigidly replied to Japan about the deployment of Su-35 in the Kuriles

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia has rigidly responded to the protest of Japan about placing of fighters on Kuriles.

Japan continues to express an open protest against the deployment of Russian combat aircraft in the southern Kuriles. In fact, the authorities of Japan continue to call a number of islands belonging to the group of southern Kurils controversial, and actively protest against their belonging to Russia, not to mention the fact that a number of them based combat aircraft.

Against the background of all these protests, the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Maria Zakharova made a tough statement, in which she stressed that the appearance of Russian Su-35S fighters on a number of islands is open, and does not mean that Russia is engaged in the militarization of the Far East.

"Everything that happens on the territory of the Russian Federation is done openly, our colleagues are informed about this, we answer their questions", - said Zakharova.

In fact, the Foreign Ministry stressed that the appearance of Russian fighters in the southern Kurils is not intended to create any threat, but this is done in the interests of ensuring the security of Russian borders, and therefore this issue can be considered closed.

The Kurils are called Kurils, which are originally Russian lands, they were taken away by the Chinese and the Japanese from the people who called themselves JURY. What japs ​​want as they want and the Chinese can put their wits in one place. Enough to give up your territory.

you do not like that Russia covers her back from the vile attack of japs

Or maybe we will also demand disputed territories, Poland, Finland, almost all present-day Ukraine, and so on, once it all belonged to the Russian Empire! And maybe Alasochka?

Nobody so screams about the return of the former islands, like Japan itself. And the US has never expressed support for this issue in favor of Japan. And everything is simple. After the end of the Second World War, the Amers divided the territories - they completely took the Aleutian ridge, the USSR - all Kuril Islands, plus South Sakhalin and in addition 4 former islands of Japan, because of which the fuss is stretching. Nobody will ever return anything to them, it's clear to the hedgehog, but they will continue to muddy the water in the trough. But this is their right.

No joint use, it is fraught with the fact that under the developing infrastructure of the islands will need a workforce, most likely the Japanese, and there and before naturalization not far, and with the increase in the number of naturalized Japanese will be held a referendum (type of Crimean) and ty-tyu island!

It is high time to do a dozen bases around the US and there will be no problems

The Japanese can either continue senselessly to protest, or conclude a peace treaty with the Russian Federation and jointly exploit and develop the islands. Well, right now, it's better for them to worry about Japan's own continued occupation of Japan by the US military.

Iskander is not needed there, DBK Bal and Bastion have been standing there for a long time.

Dear Japanese friends! You first look at your territory, for example, Fukushima. And then ... Do not anger God. And then climb with a cloth snout and a kalashny series!

Accept Japan in the Russian Federation and the problem will disappear.

There you just need to "lose" a couple of missiles in the pouring zone and the rice muzzles will simply be washed away by the tsunami ... and those who will not care about the Kuriles will not wake up ... already ...

Unknown father do not confuse Russian with obscene

Not only do we consider the islands our own, this is recognized by the whole world (like Kaliningrad).
The islands of NAM belong to the 2 World War: Japan lost them as compensation (contribution) for the losses caused by the war from Russia (the USSR).

"The Russian Foreign Ministry answered harshly" ... I specifically re-read the statement in question. Yes, Zakharova was very tough, very, very tough annealed in Baku. But this statement can hardly be called tough. I understood the main headline louder.

if the islands are Japanese then permission to visit these islands, Russia should not give, let in mid-Japan give, interestingly they will give much and how on the border will they perceive - and if they take from Russia then they recognize these islands as Russian

And why did not the Iskanders be stationed?

Japan can consider anything - this is its problem, and we consider these islands to be ours, they belong to us and we do on our territory what we consider necessary and no one should report or coordinate anything. In short we went to ... (the standard is not censorship, Russian expression)!

Pages

.

Blog and articles

upstairs