Well, the experts are clear. The fact that in Naryan-Mar the modernized remotorized plane crashed to them, as experts, no one reported. But the question to the site: why are you printing such experts?

And THAT FOR 70 YEARS NOTHING HAVE BEEN DENIED - THE POSSIBILITY OF THE RUSSIAN AVIATION

It is necessary to abandon the specialists who say this. Again, someone from the CIA transferred a bribe to someone in the depths of the Russian government to cover up a competitor? And "specialists" appeared immediately.

Sailor You are a woodpecker. flew on this bird more than 30 years. No accidents

it's time to pay attention to training pilots and technicians in the USSR how many schools were there? but now how much and the plane is beautiful

I knew the pilot from such an airplane and he claimed that he would throw the helm even and he would plan, it was impossible to break it, and you have permanent accidents, and you will be dealt with with techniques, with pilots, maybe they are buxi at the helm or nikaki, ... , where does the plane, take the statistics in the USSR on it and compare ...

No matter how reliable An-2, and any other aircraft, it must be properly (!) Operated and maintained, timely to perform current and major repairs. And if you do not, then he and the earth will fall off their wings.

And you do not fly, you swim!

Plaque on this type of 3600. Flights to the AHR. Small heights. Rice handling. Flights in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, at high temperatures. Flying with a half rotten elevator. Stopping at that time is impossible. The airplane never failed. Preparation and control of pilots strongly differs from the present.

These planes simply have nothing to break. The only thing that can affect reliability is low-quality and inadequate maintenance.

At it on take-off a failure on turns (what exactly has occurred with the turbine - now the commission clarifies). Since the acquisition there were some problems. They applied to Novosibirsk, to the manufacturer, to no avail. 2 was purchased by such aircraft TVS-2MS. The fallen one flew 2 times less than the other. He was less likely to fly.

Born to crawl, can not fly! Go with the flow ....

I wonder what kind of specialists are so stupid can not tell An-2 from TVS-2MS

do not bleed, sailor

Yes WHAT IS IT FOR SPECIALISTS ??? Assholes are real! This is not an airplane, but a FAIRY TALE !!! All the planes will be given a head start by their reliability and use in various directions, and in our vast country - ESPECIALLY !!! Only they (AN-2) need to pay more attention in the service, and in modernization, and generally in everything, including. to adjust the upgraded version SERIAL (!), which will give a high return, both inside our country and outside it (because many aircraft are known).

Is the author of this? What is this and what, what specialists, in what area, who appropriated the title of experts for them? The article is crazy, it's clear to an idiot that it's impossible to fly on a faulty airplane, but what's with An-2? In Alaska, in Canada you can find operating DC-3, and they will be older

Only enemies can write about ANNUSHKA

Well, there is not yet a more reliable and efficient aircraft in this class. And take care of your life at the exit even from the entrance. It's more dangerous.

Another throw-in for a comment. I will not even enumerate all the advantages of this machine. I flew 45 calendar years on it. flew 21 000 hours and all without crashing. Do not speak unfounded. Write the names of your specialists and everything will be clear. Can YOU mean Neradko himself an expert? Sokolov wrote a letter saying that he would fire Neradko, but what did the Prime Minister do? Nyradko's wife pronounced reprimand, and the request of the Minister of Transport was ignored. On their deputies impose a penalty priregativa head of the department, not the prime minister. Neponyatki what is it. And when this worthless prime minister is removed!

Another group of "experts" provocateurs from the fifth column! I wonder how much and who pays them now?

Only for scrap ... and nothing else ... the car is 70 years old !!! Are you a "kamikaze?" Me not. I will not even sit on board such a "machine" for a bag of gold. There is only one life. And that's it.

The goal of these "experts", under any pretext, is to remove another domestic car from the Russian sky and force the operators to buy imported equipment. And they wanted to spit on our ARZ, on the people who work there; The main thing is "rollback" from the deal.

Interestingly, these experts are experts in what? If in the field of aircraft operation, whose interests do they lobby?
Unfortunately, it is extremely rare for a person to lie on someone other than the crew. An-2 is a beautiful airplane. Morally and technologically outdated, but unlike cars, airplanes must be of high quality (if technicians with elephants are not criminals). Therefore, the technologies developed for the DECADE can hardly be the cause of the plane crash ...

AT THE TIME TO ASK THESE "EXPERTS" - WHOM DO CITIZENS WORK ...? AN-2 IS ONE OF THE MOST RELIABLE AIRCRAFT. THE VEHICLE HAD AN INTER-REPAIR CALENDAR AND HAD NO APPOINTED ... THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST MASS AIR TYPES IN THE WORLD ...

There is no substitute for it on unprepared platforms. A reliable engine or high-quality fuel and oil is needed.

An2 is the most reliable aircraft. The video crash shows that there was a large pitch angle at full load. This aircraft could take off at full blurred and contaminated sites. The problem was in the hang of the valves due to poor-quality fuel.

if cleaned empty, and it is so empty, a whole niche in the transportation of passengers through the vast expanses of Siberia, the Far East. The MI-8 road is expensive, expensive tickets. A modern aircraft is needed for 10-20 people, able to sit down and take off from ground areas, under gidrovariant.Delayem most modern fighters and for people living east of the Urals a simple, inexpensive car can not do or do not want. And villages, villages in the Siberian deafness are dying out and depopulated from transport inaccessibility, not everywhere you can build roads.

There is no logic in the note. The last accident happened with a modernized car. The fact is that when used to An-2 steel refers, almost as a simple cart. And this is a very serious aircraft. I remember how in 90-e enterprising people ponook up their An-2 and began to exploit them in their minds without proper maintenance, even gasoline from the gas stations were flooded. Almost all have perished!

The aircraft remained and profile schools are not, b90 / 130 do not produce, but this one on ts1, the level of the flight crew training has fallen, the programs have reduced (optimized) the result is natural, the level of technical and flight composition has decreased

AN-2 unique plane let it fly, but we must remember everything comes time.

Don't touch "Annushka" with dirty hands, she will outlive us all

Too in the video it seems like the rear alignment. If this is so, then it does not matter at all how many years the plane was and what kind of engine it had.

I wonder where such specialists come from? You would at least analyze the figures for the accident.

With such a fall of any other aircraft, there would be no survivors.

Why did not they list the accidents with the results of the investigations? And then it's unfounded all somehow, in a medvedevsky way.

Where do the "experts-experts" of aircraft come from? and it will fly for another 2 years, transporting people and bringing them joy. In the USSR, about half of the passenger turnover was done on the MVL, on the An-100.

I disagree with this statement!

Do these "specialists" have at least an hour of flight? real and not on a joystick? eksprits bred, like uncut dogs, one badly stupid they are, worse than any oligophrenic from a fool.

In Naryan-Mar, TVS-2M, manufactured in Novosibirsk last year, fell ...

I do not know what kind of specialists they are. But I know An-2, as the most reliable aircraft.

Experts probably did not really use this technique. An-2 is one of the most reliable aircraft GA. The reliability of an aircraft is determined not by age, but by its serviceability with sufficient resources to carry out the task.

So I did not understand which plane crashed in Naryan-Mar: In one media write that AN-2, in the other - TVS ...?

The plane as concrete is reliable, at least for 6 years of service in VKS not one plane has fallen ...

As far as we know, it was a modernized airplane, with a theater of foreign production, that got into the catastrophe.