2022-01-05
News
Ukraine and Georgia want to be admitted to NATO bypassing the main provisions and restrictions
They want to admit Ukraine and Georgia to NATO, bypassing the main provisions and restrictions of the Alliance.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the former secretary general of the North Atlantic Alliance, issued a statement in which he called for bypassing the current basic provisions of NATO and admitting Ukraine and Georgia to the military bloc. Anders Fogh Rasmussen's statement sounded against the background of the upcoming meeting of the Alliance countries and Russia in Brussels on January 12, where, as expected, the issue of further non-expansion of NATO, as well as the Alliance's refusal to admit Ukraine and Georgia to the bloc, should be discussed.
It is quite obvious that with such statements Rasmussen is trying to put pressure on Russia.
“Under no circumstances should the US or NATO commit themselves to future enlargement, real or actual. Russia has already signed the 1999 OSCE Charter, which grants "the inalienable right of each participating state to be free to choose or change its security measures, including allied treaties, as they develop." We promised Georgia and Ukraine seats at the NATO table in 2008 and it’s time for us to develop an action plan to fulfill our promise. If necessary, we can do this with the proviso that NATO Article 5 applies only to the territory under the control of Kiev and Tbilisi, but NATO cannot pursue an open door policy on enlargement, in which it continues to allow Putin to act as a doorman. "- said Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
If NATO really wants to bypass its own restrictions and accept Ukraine and Georgia into the Alliance, then Russia will immediately respond to this, probably by deploying a significant number of troops and weapons on the borders of these two states, not to mention the fact that Georgia and Ukraine will become primary targets for Russian tactical and strategic weapons.
Last news:
Recent Articles:
Latest Video:
.
News
28.04.2024
28.04.2024
Russia will react immediately to this, probably by deploying a significant number of troops.
maybe for a start he will try to at least stop the plundering of the country's resources by the same "partners" who are NATO?
Oh, the "downed pilots" climbed out ... Is this the Reisfedersen who "forgot to turn off the microphone"? :)) The closer Stoltenberg's resignation, the louder the voices of the "recorded" Russophobes ... I wonder what, for example, says about this Dalia Grybauskaite, she is also tipped as a candidate for the NATO Secretary General ... Now they will race in "capital letters" to express their "authoritative opinion."
Well, in general, Anders said correctly. Not in the sense that Ukraine and Georgia should be included in NATO, but that it is time to change these very basic provisions. For example - not to accept new members with their exclusion from Article 5, but, on the contrary, to exclude from Article 5 some of the previously accepted ones. In theory, why would the United States defend the Baltic countries, Poland and the like at the cost of threatening its own existence? It's worth it? There is a lot of screeching, but no benefit. Tell me, why is this all the United States and other large and strong members of the alliance? After all, the fate of a large and complex entity hanging over an abyss on a chain is determined by the strength of the weakest link in this very chain.
Is it true that they will accept? Even though no one stuttered that they wanted to go there. About Kazakhstan.
Wouldn't scare, would not grumble
Yes, of course NATO was very frightened by the deployment of additional. troops.
Gentlemen play by their own rules. If the results of the game do not suit the gentlemen, they change the rules.
They will definitely be accepted, and Kazakhstan and everyone else.
It's easier to start a New World War right away! Since the entry of these countries will lead to the same result.
Pages