And you go there at least once. And assess the level of patriotism.

Well, first of all, there is no need to distort my name. It is not polite. Secondly, I did not say that the creation of drones is an unrealizable task for the Russian military-industrial complex. The point is that everyone is shouting that what creates this VPC is the best in the world. And this is far from the case. Objectivity is needed. If not, then all these statements are pure propaganda.

Whom exactly will the radar not pick up? A large UAV with an external armament suspension, non-retractable rear landing gear and a hefty OLS protruding under the fuselage? Do you really believe the Bayraktar TB2 is a stealthy target for radar?

And what will prevent the X-UAV missile from hitting a large subsonic low-maneuverable UAV? Or is the "combat pilot" not aware that the same "Kornet-D" can be equipped with a thermobaric warhead with a remote fuse? What other control by wire? There, guidance in the laser channel is used. This is the so-called Beam Rider or "laser trail". As for the absence of a thermal imaging seeker, it can be seen that the X-UAV nose cone is rounded, unlike the Kornet-D. Even if now the seeker is not installed there, then its installation is clearly provided for by the design of the rocket.

Rotax has long been replaced by an analogue of the APD-110/120, as well as the rest

components of foreign manufacturers: on the Bayraktar drone

- electro-optical and infrared cameras;
- laser rangefinder;
- laser target designator;
- Rotax engine;
- onboard take-off / landing support system.

Sergei! The media, including even those with patriotic names, do not belong to Russia. Do you think they will describe the true state of affairs? It is the mouthpiece of the West and it is precisely Western interests that are promoted to the masses.

Syarozha, well, if "It says there" ... About the fence and firewood, I hope you know. UAVs are not the strongest place of the Russian army, but you have to be ... "the last in this glorious row of experts" to rely on this "technological achievement", as our Ukrainian brothers in reason did. To adopt the American methods of conducting a database: quietly flew up, took aim, killed nine (including children) - not for the Russian Army. To criticize it, of course, is better, you need to understand only one thing: the creation of a UAV is not so not so unrealizable a task for the Russian military-industrial complex. Also "it says there": "do not flatter yourself, come closer" :))

I read an article on the site "military affairs". It says that Russian drones are rubbish. From Russian only gliders. Everything else from abroad. All control and guidance systems are assembled from civilian-class components, that is, purchased almost on an ibey or alibaba.

And what? Someone said that Orion will be used against UAVs, namely aircraft type? Everything is perfectly visible on the video. What they wanted to destroy was destroyed. If they want, they will destroy Bayraktar. One destroyed was already brought by the Armenians.

the charge power of the warhead of the cornet rocket is excessive to destroy fragile uavs, if the weight of the warhead is reduced, the range will increase

Only by a laser beam, the thermal and radar will not be taken, but the cornet hits 5 km both horizontally and vertically, and the radar from the ground can aim

Some kind of game. Bayraktar is not designed for air-to-air missiles.

... Do you really need a direct hit, like a tank? One striking element - and the "smart" UAV starts thinking about suicide :))

A pilot is a person who knows how to fly an airplane and nothing more. Only a designer who develops missiles of a certain class can be an expert and draw conclusions about their effectiveness and use for destroying flying vehicles.