Russian rocket

News

US: Russian missile with a nuclear engine is a failure


Russian President Vladimir Putin boasted this year with a sensational development - a new missile with a nuclear engine that has unlimited range. However, informed sources familiar with the data of the US intelligence report argue that this missile did not pass a single successful flight test.

In the period from November 2017 to February 2018, tests of the Russian cruise missile were conducted four times, and each time the launch ended in a fall, sources told CNBC, who did not want to publish their names.

The US intelligence reports indicate that the longest flight lasted a little more than two minutes, for which the missile overcame 35 kilometers, after which it lost control and it fell. The shortest test took 4 seconds, and 8 kilometers of distance traveled, respectively.

Sources do not have the information, whether the rocket nuclear reactor creates risks for human health and biosystems.

This weapon, developed since the 2000s, takes off on a gasoline engine, after which, on the marching section of the trajectory, it switches to a nuclear engine, the sources explain.

According to the test results, it can be said that the nuclear heart of a cruise missile did not hammer. It is imperfect, and can not accomplish the flight of unlimited range, about which Putin was repeating.

According to sources, the Kremlin leadership ordered the tests to be carried out at any cost, ignoring the objections of the engineers working in the program, who were categorically against starting them. They were concerned about what was happening as the system is still in its early stages of development.

During the March appeal to the nation, Putin said that this cruise missile could deliver a nuclear charge to any part of the world by overcoming enemy air defense systems. Together with her, in his speech he then touted hypersonic weapons and called him "invincible."

A week ago, CNBC received data that this hypersonic aircraft, against which the United States currently has no protection, will be ready for use closer to 2020.

Sources reported that Russia successfully tested this type of weapon, which can be equipped with a nuclear warhead, twice in 2016. The third test of the hypersonic vehicle failed, as it fell a few minutes before delivering an aimed strike. a fourth trial is scheduled for this summer.

Based on materials from CNBC - USA

So this is what they are!)))

The gasoline engine is from a chainsaw probably

Tomagashki fall like flies, and the ship D.Kuk constantly trolls Drying and falls into a stupor ... and this is all a fake, probably, it's not Russia ... ha ha. But this is already yesterday!

Want to try?

You forgot the main experts on the planet-Scientists of Great Britain!

Americans can calmly settle down. -can try to bang for you. then we will mumble

not there is a boiler room on the corner and three stokers!

I'm glad-thought there is no adequate! Also I'm rusting here!

a lot eats so the gasoline has risen in price!

I'll remind you of the proverb / folk / chicken in the nest and the egg still in the pi ....

I represent the efficiency of such an installation ... And peak power in general will be fabulous

And what other countries do waste from nuclear reactors send instead of cores to shells? Yugoslavia remembers

Ecologically safe type of weapon ... I only know one thing-hands-feet. Everything else is harmful to nature, even minimal

Four cycles in front and two bars in the back. Therefore, it does not go off course and saves the specified flight program.

Now nitrogen with oxygen burns, ordinary air and burns well
By means of a focused beam, you can burn cube kilometers of air.
Kumekai (the doctor).

I would be surprised more, if the Pindos, began to sing us for different, and even not significant progress and what achievements in different sectors. !!! )) And what did you expect from a competitor !? ))) Look at their choices, so they are ready to zap up each other! And what about us is already funny))) and not something amazing!

As soon as Russia announces the best invention, there are always "exceptional" experts from Western countries who are theoretically and practically better "savvy".

And told straight, naive

Calculations can be done by anyone. It is enough to calculate the engine power and the amount of fuel assemblies required for its transmission to air. Then estimate the weight of only the envelopes of fuel elements and get an absurd figure. The coefficients of heat transfer in the range from one thousand to one and a half thousand degrees with a temperature gradient of 500 degrees can be found. The air flow velocity can change this figure, but only at the expense of reducing the final gas temperature.
.
\ The variant of non-shell refractory alloys of radioactive isotopes is not to be considered - such a missile will fly its entire flight with exfoliating particles of fuel and infect its territory.

Just a couple of months ago I wrote that a rocket with a nuclear engine is not feasible. What can be done from the point of view of physics will be ineffective. And, the last option, effective from the point of view of the military missile will have a shelf life of six months and is extremely dangerous in storage and operation.

Well, the Yankees and hohlam as always know better)))

What hypersonic aircraft, even if the hypersonic missile Americans can not create.

It's not a hyper sound, it's just a cruise missile with a nuclear engine that has unlimited range, hypersonic is the Vanguard and the Dagger.

From LADA Priora

Steam boilers inventors are also dangerous !!!? And those magnetic storms emitted by the Sun inspire !!!? Be sure of the result, the main thing is to use Zdravomysliyu !!!

poor pindosiki no longer know what to do with fear ...))) go finish your fu-35 miserable)

"... a little over two minutes, during which the rocket covered 35 kilometers ..."
that is 17 km. per minute that is 1000km / hour. This is about what rocket - on which Munchausen flew to the moon?

Just think, you just warned.

Again spies shot tests were studied and think that this should work all?

Realize your insignificance.

Wow ! Created and tested at the stand - this is how?! The nuclear engine can not but emit radiation: the reactor needs something to cool. At the nuclear power plant - it's water, and on such a rocket the flow of incoming air, which at the exit is full of fonet and the terrain over which such a missile will fly, in the next decades then it is desirable not to visit. Through the entire flight route.

Do not want to try? And to look where will be your forcemeat? Soldiers are torn, machine guns in the hands of holding or three combat cartridges in the USSR AND ALL BATTLE PREPARATION?

Two nuclear

All the tests passed normally.

On the Pindos website, they are slandering Russia.
Server in San Francisco.
Everything that is written here is shit.

To the note schizophrenic from the USA.
Not so long ago in the suburbs found a parking lot with hundreds of abandoned taxis. So this is nothing more than an arch-sealed repository of ICE for our supercorets.

All the same, sooner or later you will reach "to the edge"!

Well, apparently it takes off at an increased speed, and then goes to a lowered one)))

I'll read your forum. Russian at you the most ingenious sofa analyst. I want to invite you to the Mene in America. I will pay a million dollars a day.

When will this communist habit of standing up for the whole people be eradicated? For example, no one "brought me to the brink," and it is unlikely that when it will.

The whole world already knows that Putin never lies. Quite awkward and unprofessional fake. Guys-Democrats, learn the "mate part"!

I would like to ask: is the "gasoline engine" of this rocket a two-stroke or is it really a four-stroke?

Screw on supersonic? This is a new word in science and technology! =)

And yet, I read, the United States allegedly sent a rover to Mars. Sometimes they write that their Intel is much better than our Elbrus. And yesterday they wrote at all that the VVB of Russia is almost less than 2 times the GDP of one state. Sooo, these funny Americans are. I would not believe them.

They that there smoke? The rocket flew 35 km - is not this a success? At them there in the USA test sites on 1000 km that?

Why should someone introduce, when you can try to discredit such an organized lie.

Tales of the failures of the Russian missile industry, another lie special. services. The goal is to lower Russia's military authority before the world and not to block the old programs
Arms, profitable and rolled up for American corporations. The United States only dreams of spying on Russian secrets. There will be a case, God forbid, receive - we'll send both in a wrapper and with the appropriate stuffing!

For 4 seconds 8km, for 120seconds (2minutes) 35km.Pluho prepared the material malicious.

With a nuclear engine it's certainly nonsense.
Where do you put the rocket on practice shooting?
infection throughout the entire flight route!
Therefore, the USSR did not begin to make nuclear engines.

There the solid fuel accelerator costs, and then, yes, it flies on birch firewood. They throw gnomes into the furnace .. :-))))

From the beginning it was clear that Putin had prepared for the performance by putting dust in the eye. and he himself does it often. people brought to the edge ...

Oh ... how they were freaked out! "This cannot be!" !!! (read: "guard! The Russians have beaten us again !!!"

For some reason, all these professional experts are from Ukraine. And it is very convenient to refer to them "CNBC - USA".

Something similar worked back in 1958 year

A throw test involves the fall of a rocket

you are # $ # $ # $ or a nuclear physicist, everything is so simple)), then the best minds are constructed, they think up, they embody in life, and the expert knows everything)))

a piece of the idiot all you know, he took part in everything, and now infa for tuporylyh))), 2g back to the anniversary of the Rosatom Kirienko on TV stated that in Russia a nuclear engine for spacecrafts was created and tested at the stand, the engine does not emit radiation tk works on a completely different principle, that's how these engines stand on hyper sound rockets,

With this rocket, the GDP was set ...

Who who committed. The violinist told them everything after taking a laughing gas.

And who did this Pindos to the tests allowed, as always, wishful thinking, assholes ...

Dear Trump, we do not yet experience a rubber bomb, it's ready completely, it's just impossible to stop it, it will jump until the earth collapses. This is the tool of the day of judgment.

Okay, you laugh. Trump also said that they have smart missiles, with dark energy. Only now no one agrees from the Silicon Valley to fly in the rocket together with a thousand Negroes.

Would you like to check?

Vlad, I see you are completely shamed! Utry the snot !!!

Yes, in general, this rocket with a steam engine, with a large supply of water and can swing around the ball for years.

There's just gasoline was 92)) They will fill 98 and fly as it should))

It's too easy for you! 7200 :))
And nothing that the missile was accelerating?
In the first second she went somewhere 400 meters in total.
For two seks, one and a half miles.
At the end of a third of a second, it overcame about 2,5-3km.
And so we get that in the last second the rocket passed about 5km. Well, plus a minus :))
5km in seconds, this is not 7200 per hour !!! This is 18000 !!!!
On gasoline !!!!!

Developers blunt, but the savvy experts - this is the power

"But the rocket needs to fly over the allies to get to the USSR :)"
I made fun of it) .... First you can fly on such a rocket on any trajectory, secondly, the radioactive allies never embarrassed the US.
It's simply impossible to exploit and test such a rocket. And it clogs with radiation not only allies but also the hegemons themselves. That was the problem. But that's a story about a Pindos missile ... but nothing is known about the Russian one.

Gy gi America was afraid of allies to sprinkle radiation ... In the storyteller. She does not have any allies with licks.

Our developers, although they make small nuclear power plants, are still dull. In the 60s, Soviet scientists could not bring to mind such an attitude, and modern dropouts and "effective managers" decided to deceive Putin and promised to make such a rocket. Use a nuclear reactor to instantly heat up to 3000 degrees, more than 10 cubic meters of air per second. this is a very complex technological challenge. Not yet doable. But there is another solution, simple and inexpensive, and the main thing will be a positive result. Use a nuclear installation as a source of electric current to drive electric motors of screw turbines. By applying the patent and flow control technology, you can easily achieve a reduction in aerodynamic drag to zero and supersonic speeds, almost to 3M. And it is not necessary to stupidly assert that it is impossible to achieve supersonic speeds with propellers, you do not understand well the nature of flight.

While the United States that something will come up we will go far ahead do not twist!

Turbines ... what are you talking about, young man?
In school, you need to learn before you write comments!

Interesting calculations. You are probably a theoretical physicist. In the morning what kind of sneakers do you wear? Both left? Americans still 30 years ago this principle was implemented. The problem was that it was a VERY DIRTY and RADIACTIVE exhaust of heated air. It was possible for the rocket to simply fly over the territory of the enemy without exploding, receiving radioactive contamination equivalent to the explosion of an atomic bomb. But the missile must fly above the allies to get to the USSR :)

Gasoline engine - apparently strongly in the head of a bang!

Well, how much you can! even for those who on an armored train chewed that these were Sarmat launches without marching engines, specially practiced

If they do not believe, they will see the action. Last time.))))

That's when it arrives, then believe it! But it will be too late. Guys let's be friends...

Warming up plasma as a result of the atomic reaction. It is this principle that has been voiced for a long time.

And what should we prove to the Americans? Well they think so and let them think. As one humorist says, then there will be a surprise, if that.

Correctly, let the Pindos think that Russia generally does not have any missiles ... !! When they are sharahnem, they will think that it's aliens and will immediately surrender!)))))))

The shortest test took 4 seconds, and 8 kilometers of distance traveled, respectively. That is, the speed of the rocket was 7200 km / h on a gasoline engine. Be careful of the pindos! If we fly on gasoline, then what about nuclear engines to talk about.

"This weapon, which has been in development since the 2000s, takes off on a gasoline engine and then switches to a nuclear engine during the cruise," the sources explain. THE ROCKET IS NOT A GASOLINE MOTOR - THIS IS INCREDIBLE TURNING !!! PROBABLY THERE IS ANYTHING V16 BITURBO WITH ALL-WHEEL DRIVE! I haven’t met such a rustle yet !!!

Vova, you're so clever, I love you!

About the bridge you are the same pisali.Oblomilas.

Since when did the American intelligence service begin to share information with murky "sources"? then they wrote that it was not built and it is generally impossible to make, then it falls. Determine the lies of dill.

and how will the reactor receive electricity? not turbines by accident? twist the turbines to generate electricity to then turn this energy to other turbines?

Newspapers, newspapers, newspapers. Fuck us special services? )))

Ahahah. It's like a Crimean bridge. That hologram, it will fall apart, it will not be built! Guys! Yes, it already exists! And working!!! Want to check it out?

Let and further calmed down themselves And further they think that this is the Chebarkul meteorite. Understand then he will fly. And at the expense of the engine - the phrase about gasoline is just a miracle - in the same vein - not exactly on the coal and stoker

Nuclear reactor - Peltier elements - battery - electric motor. Must work

In general, such engines have already worked in 70-ies on our satellites, t the same amers in the 90-x part of the documentation were taken out!

Putin's nuclear missile raises doubts from the very beginning. If the principle - instantaneous heating of the air reactor to expand it, then counting the amount of air per second necessary for a jet to move a rocket weighing a tonne, you need air of tens of tons. Preheat 10 tons of air to several thousand degrees ha very short time is a difficult, you can say unrealizable task. A more realistic scheme is to use the reactor to generate electricity and rotate electric turbines. In any case, the rocket is obtained at a low speed and it is easy to overtake and bring down. There are better technologies. But those who implement this nuclear stupidity do not want to introduce the best of other people's ideas. So these developers shame the country into the whole world.

Early start to rejoice. They will bring it to mind I do not doubt. With the Bulava, there were also problems. Russian developers have repeatedly proved their genius.

Those. with a similar statement, they stupidly surrendered their agent (not just to instill an agent in such secret units), and the FSB sit and poke at the nose ... Bullshit for idiots.

Brycevrete - it is not a gasoline engine, but a steam engine. DB.

Pages

.
upstairs